| Policy Details | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy Owner | Head of Admission, Registration and Exam Services | ||
| CE Sponsor | Vice Principal: Curriculum Innovation and Business Transformation | ||
| Date created this year | 22 September 2025 | ||
| Version: | Approved by: | Date approved: | To be reviewed: |
| 1 | College Executive | 25 September 2025 | September 2026 |
| Version Control | |||
| Version Number | Changes from previous 12 months policy | ||
| 1 | All changes have been updated to reflect the most recent JCQ regulations, and to update date references throughout. | ||
| Yes/No | Comments | ||
| 1 | Does the policy/guidance affect one group less or more favourably than another on the basis of: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Race or ethnicity | No | ||
| Disability | No | ||
| Gender | No | ||
| Religion or belief | No | ||
| Sexual orientation | No | ||
| Age | No | ||
| Marriage and Civil Partnership | No | ||
| Maternity and Pregnancy | No | ||
| Gender Reassignment | No | ||
| 2 | Is there any evidence that some groups are affected differently? | No | |
| 3 | If you have identified potential discrimination, are any exceptions valid, legal and/or justifiable? | N/A | |
| 4 | Is the impact of the policy/guidance likely to be negative? | No | |
| 5 | If so, can the impact be avoided? | N/A | |
| 6 | What alternatives are there to achieving the policy/guidance without the impact? | N/A | |
| 7 | Can we reduce the impact by taking different action? | N/A |
The purpose of this policy is to provide clarity to learners, staff and parents/carers in relation to Colchester Institute’s provision of Exam Access Arrangements (EAA) informed and guided by current legislation. The scope of this policy relates specifically to Further Education learners (including Access to Higher Education), and Apprentices, and those on government funded part time programmes. A separate policy applies to Higher Education, at University Centre Colchester.
Colchester Institute’s policy for access arrangements in examinations is reviewed and updated annually, on the publication of updated Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) regulations and guidance contained in the publication: JCQ Access Arrangements and Reasonable Adjustments 2025 . References to ‘AA’ refer to JCQ Access Arrangements and Reasonable Adjustments document which regulates the exam access arrangements available and the way these are applied to most examinations which are conducted for the Awarding Bodies. Exam access arrangements must reflect a learners normal way of working.
The purpose of an access arrangement/reasonable adjustment is to ensure, where possible, that barriers to assessment are removed for a disabled candidate preventing them from being placed at a substantial advantage due to persistent and significant difficulties. The integrity of the assessment is maintained, whilst at the same time providing access to assessments for disabled candidates. (JCQ AA 4.21)
Exam access arrangements allow learners with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND), medical conditions, disabilities, temporary illness or injuries, or for whom English is an additional language to access exams and assessments. In this way, Colchester Institute acts as an agent of the Awarding Bodies to comply with the duty of the Equality Act 2010 to make ‘reasonable adjustments’.
A reasonable adjustment may be unique to an individual and may not be included in the list of available access arrangements included in this policy.
Each adjustment must be based on the candidate’s individual profile and the impact their needs have on their ability to access examinations/assessments. The aim is to remove barriers to assessment without giving an unfair advantage to any particular candidate group, ensuring all candidates have a fair opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge, skills and understanding. (JCQ AA 4.1)
An adjustment may not be considered reasonable if it involves unreasonable costs, unreasonable time frames, or affects the security of the assessment. Colchester Institute is bound by immovable deadlines for JCQ and the organisation/administration of examinations within Colchester Institute.
Colchester Institute will endeavour to follow this policy to apply for and implement EAAs for eligible learners, however these key principles will ordinarily apply:
Declare their need for EAA within the first 6 weeks of their programme, and where requested, provide the EAA team with any relevant information and evidence of their specific need, within the first 8 weeks of their programme, to enable them to make the appropriate assessment and recommendations for the learner. This evidence may include:
iii. EHCP: Where we have a copy of a current EHCP, learners should ask their school or previous educational provider to confirm which EAAs were implemented by them.
If learners with known existing support needs do not provide the evidence required within the first 8 weeks of their study programme, or if the necessary assessment appointment is missed, it will result in exam access arrangements being declined or not being in place in time for the exams.
Please see Appendix 1
Involvement of parents and next of kin
Where a learner is aged 17 or younger on the 31st August 2025, or where they are aged 19 – 24 and have a current EHCP, Colchester Institute will endeavour to include the learners’ named next of kin (NoK) in all email communications about exam access arrangements. It is the learners’ responsibility for ensuring up to date contact information is provided and updated as necessary.
The EAA Team will:
Please see Appendix 2
Process for curriculum and apprenticeship staff:
Please see Appendix 3
Learners are asked to declare their SEND and access arrangements when applying to Colchester Institute and / or at enrolment, and to confirm whether exam access arrangements were provided at their school or previous education provider.
Within the first 6 weeks of the start of their programme, learners who have declared a need for EAA will be contacted to provide relevant evidence in support of their request. Where applicable this request will also be sent to the learners’ next of kin.
Once the appropriate evidence has been received it will either be processed so that EAA can be applied for or an appointment to assess for EAAs can be made.
If the required evidence is not received by the end of the first 8 weeks of the programme of learning, Colchester Institute may not be able to process any exam access arrangements request in time for exams, except in extenuating circumstances (for example bereavement or medical emergency).
Colchester Institute will endeavour to process exam access arrangement requests at the earliest opportunity, based on the expected date of a learner’s first assessment or examination.
Exam access arrangements will only be processed where they are supported by the centre and the candidate meets the published criteria for the arrangement(s) with the full supporting evidence in place
Learners (and NoK if applicable) will be notified if an Awarding Body does not approve an application for an EAA. Colchester Institute can appeal this decision on the learner’s behalf.
A learner can appeal an Awarding Body’s decision by completing the online Appeal Request form that is available on Colchester Institute Portal.
Late diagnosis of specific learning difficulty (SpLD) and temporary arrangements.
In cases of a newly identified SpLD or where a learner has a temporary illness or injury at the time of an examination, Colchester Institute can review cases on an individual basis. Whilst Colchester Institute will endeavour to put suitable adjustments in place, this may not be possible if there is insufficient time or evidence to organise the EAA prior to the exam. In the event that EAAs cannot be applied Colchester Institute can consider submitting a Special Consideration form at the time of the examination / assessment.
Organisations are able to implement a range of exam access arrangements without application to the JCQ / Awarding Body approval for the arrangements listed below, however Colchester Institute must be satisfied that:
Centre approved arrangements can include:
This list is not exhaustive. All exam access arrangements are assessed based on the needs of the individual learner, their normal way of working, supporting evidence and what is considered reasonable by Colchester Institute.
| Examples of specific need | Examples of available access arrangements (not exhaustive as dependent on the specific need) |
| Cognition and learning Communication and interaction Medical condition Sensory impairment Physical impairment Social, mental and emotional | Extra time (please note that supervised rest breaks may be more appropriate than extra time and, in most cases, will be trialled before extra time is considered) Reader or computer reader Scribe (writer) or scribe typist/speech to text software Word processor Supervised rest breaks either inside or supervised outside the room Prompter *Coloured or modified examination papers/text Coloured overlays Smaller examination rooms or in exceptional circumstances an individual room |
*See Section 7.1 for more information
Coloured paper, for those with visual stress can be provided from a standard range of colours. These colours can be supplied on the basis of known prior needs and current normal way of working.
At Colchester Institute the following colours are approved and available for use:
Should these colours not prove suitable, learners will be required to produce evidence of clinical assessment or will be advised to seek an intuitive colorimetry test with a suitably qualified optometrist.
Colour overlays of any colour can be used but the learner has to supply their own and ensure they bring to all classes, assessments and exams.
Learners with approved access to word processors are allowed to do so to remove barriers which prevent them from being placed at a substantial disadvantage as a consequence of persistent and significant difficulties.
The use of word processors is only permitted whilst ensuring that the integrity of the assessment is maintained, and where it will not compromise the assessment objectives of the specification in question.
Learners may not require the use of a word processor in each specification. As subjects and their methods of assessments may vary, leading to different demands of learners, the need for the use of a word processor is considered on a subject-by- subject basis.
The use of a word processor is requested either as part of a JCQ8 or an application from tutors providing reasoning and evidence as to why use of a computer is appropriate for the learner and includes evidence that this is their normal way of working.
A learner will not be granted the use of a word processor just because he/she prefers to type rather than write or can work faster on a keyboard or because he/she uses a laptop at home.
Learners can only be granted the use of a word processor if it is appropriate to their needs (for example, poor/illegible handwriting; the quality of language significantly improves as a result of using a word processor due to problems with planning and organisation when written by hand).
When in use in an examination, word processors must be:
A small group may be recommended in a classroom accommodating up to 20 learners where it can be evidenced that sitting an exam in a large exam room would place a candidate at significant disadvantage to their peers and that this is their normal way of working, and where the EAA assessment indicates that:
A separate room (learner and invigilator in a room entirely separate from other learners) may be recommended where it can be evidenced that a small group provision would put them at a ‘substantial disadvantage’ to other candidates, where this is their normal and current way of working in assessments and mock examinations, and where the EAA assessment indicates that:
In order to provide a separate room, supporting evidence is required from both the teaching staff and the learner.
Evidence can be in the form of:
A separate room can only be awarded in exceptional cases and where the relevant criteria has been met to support this need. Nervousness, low level anxiety or being worried about examinations is not sufficient grounds for separate invigilation at Colchester Institute.
Colleges are regularly inspected to ensure they have followed JCQ regulations; Colchester Institute is required to hold evidence in its files that can be inspected at short notice. For this reason, Colchester Institute will keep copies of evidence of need, Form 8, Form 9, letters from outside agencies, record of access arrangements used, for a minimum of 3 years. All information and data, whether electronic or paper based, will be stored in accordance with Colchester Institute’s GDPR policy.
A candidate may decide that they do not wish to use the access arrangements that have been granted to them for a particular exam or assessment. The access arrangement will still be put in place for applicable future exams and assessments. However, if the candidate never uses the access arrangement granted to them, after careful consideration, the SENCO may consider withdrawing the access arrangement from future exams and assessments.
Special Educational Needs and Disability Policy
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Policy
Admissions Policy
Data Protection Policy